Dear HSLDA: I Told You So (NEA, Anti-Homeschool Organization Endorses Huckabee)
Dear HSLDA,
A few weeks ago, I sent you a letter and published an open letter saying that Mike Huckabee goes against several of the HSLDA’s beliefs, and panders to teachers unions. Well today, interestingly enough, Mike Huckabee was endorsed by an association that said this about homeschooling:
- “…home schooling programs cannot provide the student with a comprehensive education experience.”
- “…if parental preference home schooling study occurs, students enrolled must meet all state requirements. Instruction should be by persons who are licensed by the appropriate state education licensure agency, and a curriculum approved by the state department of education should be used.”
According to the NEA, homeschooling “can’t” work, and if it’s permitted, it should be a mirror image of the public schools.
(This came from my article ‘Mike Huckabee the Friend of Homeschoolers? Available here: http://dhgrassrevolt.wordpress.com/2007/11/01/mike-huckabee-the-friend-of-homeschoolers/
here )
(You can read my original letter to the HSLDA here: http://dhgrassrevolt.wordpress.com/2007/11/17/open-letter-to-dr-michael-farris-and-the-home-school-legal-defense-association/
here )
What organization is this? The New Hampshire Chapter of the NEA (the National Education Association)
http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/05/497082.aspx
From NBC/NJ’s Tricia Miller
The 16,000-member New Hampshire affiliate of the National Education Association has chosen to recommend to its members Hillary Clinton in the Democratic primary and Mike Huckabee in the Republican primary, according to a source within the state NEA.This is the first time the state affiliate has picked a candidate in the GOP primary, and it follows Huckabee’s showing as the only Republican who spoke to the NEA convention in July.
The state chapter’s membership is more than 25% Republican, said the source, and the committee didn’t want those members to be ignored. When Huckabee spoke at the convention and participated in an interview with the state affiliate, deciding members felt it would be right to point that out to members. Only education and related positions were considered, and the board appreciated Huckabee’s “strong views on public education,” especially supporting the arts and music. The board might have felt differently if it had considered the former Arkansas governor’s opinions on “social values issues” and “war issues,” the source said.
The state chapter’s process began with its government relations committee (made up of 15 retired and active members appointed by the state president) and interviews with the candidates, according to Rick Trombley, director of public affairs for the state affiliate. Last Wednesday, committee members had the choice of not recommending any candidates, recommending one candidate or recommending multiple candidates to the executive board. At that time, it chose Clinton and Huckabee.
The board met Friday with the option of ratifying or not ratifying the committee’s recommendation. It could not consider any recommendations other than the one given by the government relations committee. The chapter plans to announce its decision to members as early as this week and has asked the two candidates to be present.
Reg Weaver, president of the national NEA, said he met with all of the Democratic candidates and one Republican — Huckabee — in September, and would, in accordance with the NEA’s process, make his recommendation to the national organization’s PAC Council in the next couple weeks. The council will accept or reject his recommendation. He said he understands that some state affiliates, like New Mexico and North Carolina, have already endorsed their favorite sons, but he hopes other affiliates will wait to “concur or not concur” with his recommendation.
Scott McGilvray, president of the Manchester Education Association, endorsed Edwards Monday at a roundtable with about 20 teachers. The MEA is the largest of about 200 affililates of the New Hampshire state chapter of the National Education Association, according to the chapter’s communications coordinator Carol Backus.
“He’s put, in my belief, the most comprehensive education policy on the table of any of the candidates. He is a product — his wife and family — of public schools,” McGilvray said in his introduction. “[He] was a big proponent, or is a big proponent, of unionized labor and lent his support to the Manchester Education Association in our contract fight earlier in the year and went out and reached out to the mayor and board of aldermen through a letter and conversation and assisted us greatly in that.”
You are wrong about Huckabee on homeschooling. Please don’t keep buying into the smear distortions being put out by the establishment candidates.
Watch this YouTube:
By: Curious George on December 7, 2007
at 12:27 am
Curious George, this is not the line of an establishment candidate, but information on the HSLDA website itself.
Why would the most liberal education group in the country, the NEA, endorse both the “authentic conservative” Huckabee and the most liberal candidate, Hillary.
Authentic conservatives are the polar opposite of everything the NEA stands for.
Huckabee seems embarassed by the endorsement you can’t even find a mention of it on his website.
It’s not we who are wrong about Huckabee, but Huckabee who is wrong for homeschoolers. His policies in education will be a problem for homeschoolers in years to come. It’s better to learn the truth now before he gets in the White House and homeschoolers wonder why they even helped him get there.
I’m not speaking on behalf of any “establishment” candidate. I am a homeschooling mother of 6 who has done her research.
By: Spunky on December 7, 2007
at 3:40 pm
The NEA didn’t endorse Gov. Huckabee … the NH affilliate did. That’s an importasnt distinction.
The NH affiliate is more than 25% Republican.
Homeschoolers in AR were helped, not hurt, by Huckabee.
By: wickle on December 13, 2007
at 4:27 pm
That depends on your defintion of “help.” I don’t consider requiring parents to tell the government their going to homeshcool, waiting 14 days to take their child out of a state school, and testing or truancy laws, “helping.”
He helped them in 1997, then undid most of it in 1999. He signed the law that HSLDA said took them a step back. Not my idea of progress. He could have vetoed the law, or let it go unsigned but he did neither he signed it.
He once refused to sign a law because it referred to disasters as “acts of God.” So he’s not afraid to use the veto, but for some reason he refused to do it here. That’s not my idea of someone “helping” homeschoolers.
By: Spunky on December 14, 2007
at 12:52 am
Spunky: Thanks for your comments. You make LOTS of sense. I cannot figure out HSLDA. I think Farris is looking for a job in a Huck administration. I’m glad I got out of HSLDA years ago. I wouldn’t want to subsidize any more of Farris’s nonsense.
By: Eliza on December 15, 2007
at 9:10 pm
“The NH affiliate is more than 25% Republican.”
EXACTLY!!!! This is why the Republican Party is NOT GOOD for Homeschoolers!
I have voted Constitution Party for the past 8yrs. Were it not for Ron Paul I would not be voting Repub this round either! Even the Constitution Party has endorsed Paul, yet HSLDA is aligning themselves with Huck? God help us all!
If the NEA endorsed Jesus Christ I would become a Buddhist tommorw!
Kent
By: Kent on December 30, 2007
at 4:57 am