Posted by: thelastinkling | October 28, 2007

New Polls

Duncan is up in both the latest CNN and Fox News polls showing him as now the top of the lower tier and on his way up towards Huckabee. Is the day we have been waiting for upon us soon?  Time will tell. Keep up the good work everyone!!!

—-Fox News:—–

If the 2008 Republican presidential primary were held today, for whom would
you vote if the candidates were: (RANDOMIZE)

——————- Rep —————–
23-24  9-10   11-12  21-22  17-18  26-27    5-6   15-16   17-18
Oct 07 Oct 07 Sep 07 Aug 07 Jul 07 Jun 07   Jun 07 May 07  Apr 07
Rudy Giuliani  31% 29% 34% 30% 27% 31%  24% 25%  36%
Fred Thompson  17  16  22  15  17  18   14   9    9
John McCain   12  12  16   7  17  18   15  18   17
Mitt Romney    7  11   8  12  10   8   12  10   11
Mike Huckabee   5   5   2   3   3   3    3   1    1
Duncan Hunter   3   1   3   -   -   1    1   1    2
Tom Tancredo   2   2   1   1   1   1    1   1   na
Ron Paul     1   2   2   3   2   -    2   1    -
Sam Brownback  na   2   1   1   1   1    -   2    2
Chuck Hagel   na  na   1   -   -   1    1   -    -
Jim Gilmore   na  na  na  na  na   -    1   1    1
Tommy Thompson  na  na  na  na   1   2    3   2    4
(Other)     2   1   1   2   2   1    -   2    2
(Don’t know)  16  17  11  24  20  12   21  26   14
(Would not vote
in GOP primary)  4   3   1   3   2   3    3   2    -
———-

Go here (http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/10/16/schneider.poll/index.html ) to read an article about the recent CNN poll with similar results.

(and here are the current results of the latest FreeRepublic poll :)

10/23) Who would you vote for if you were not afraid that your candidate might not win?

Duncan Hunter
Fred Thompson
Ron Paul
Mike Huckabee
Rudy Giuliani
Mitt Romney
Tom Tancredo
Alan Keyes
Other
John McCain

Posted in Duncan Hunter, polls | Tags: , , , , ,

« California inferno sets off political firestorm
Mike Huckabee Advocating Open Borders at LULAC Convention in 2005 »

Responses

Good amunition to use for Naysayers, or when calling a talk show.

Let’s each of us call a talk show this week, or at least write an editor’s letter, to help Hunter’s number increase more.

Let’s strike while the iron is hot.

By: Bev DeCarlo on October 28, 2007
at 8:42 pm

Someone needs to get through to those within the Hunter campaign and remind them that they can’t run a campaign without money. ( http://www.opensecrets.org/pres08/index.asp?cycle=2008 )
They need some big money fundraisers. Selling ball caps and t-shirts is great and admirable but its not going to pay for nationwide TV and Radio ads. We all know that once folks hear/see DH they like him. Problem is there’s too much ground to cover and DH and crew are trying to cover that ground physically. Radio and TV waves can cover that ground much faster.

There’s still time but there’s no time to waste. DD

By: Darvin Dowdy on November 1, 2007
at 4:11 am

Thankfully there is now a radio ad in New Hampshire with Yeager on it

By: thelastinkling on November 1, 2007
at 2:06 pm

I have to say it. I am a dyed in the wool republican and have been since serving as an infantryman in Vietnam in 66-67. I have seen a lot of campaigns in the many years since then. This one is going to determine if the country becomes socialist under the rule of Hillary or improves under republican leadership.

That being said, you people have to face the cold hard facts of life. Duncan Hunter has the same chance of gaining the nomination as a snowball in hell has a chance of surviving. The only people that know who he is are people in southern California.

I have no doubt Hunter is a good man and has the right values but he has one problem, his supporters. They turn people away from Hunter by spamming forums all over the net and attempting to shove Hunter down the throats of other people. Hunter supporters have morphed into the same kind of people Ron Paul has supporting him.

Hunter supporters never have anything good to say about anyone other than Hunter. They have developed a history of attacking each and everyone that does not support Hunter as they do. As I said, take a long hard look at what you folks are doing. Rather than drumming up support for your candidate your tactics are turning people away.

As I said, I like him but, to be truthful, he is simply not presidential material. He is a career politician in the House of Representatives and has peaked. He can be an asset to a new republican administration but he cannot now nor will he ever win the nomination much less the presidency.

Time to place your support behind whoever wins the republican nomination.

By: Logical on November 2, 2007
at 5:59 pm

hey logic… I’m with ya’ on the died in the wool part and i get where you’re coming from on the more, shall we say, offbeat fans. All sidwalk chalk aside, I don’t live in CA (thank God), i think spam is something that comes in a can and would never resort to the flooding tactics of the ‘ronbots’, have never carried a picket sign but have voted in every election since President Nixon.

I’m not sure that he has a snowballs chance or not… but he is the best candidate and that’s what I go by. Especially in the primary… if I’m gonna make a “statement vote” thats the time to do it.

Otherwise I’ll vote for the Republican candidate unless Hillary switches parties by then.

By: red s tater on November 2, 2007
at 9:06 pm

Exactly the thing I like to hear red. Support him in the primary but if he does not win shift the support to the candidate.

By: Logical on November 3, 2007
at 12:06 am

Duncan Huner will be on Bill Cunningham’s radio show, either this Sunday, or next Sunday.

Hunter was on Glenn Beck’s radio show, and Glen Beck likes Hunter so much, he is going to have Hunter on his tv show for a full hour, but it hasn’t been decided yet when.

That’s like a free one-hour tv ad. WTG Glenn Beck!

By: Bev DeCarlo on November 4, 2007
at 3:36 am

only tancredo would get my vote besides hunter we need to donate ………no moderate will ever get my vote again, ill vote independant first….

By: mainer for hunter on November 23, 2007
at 12:13 pm

Leave a response






Your response:

Categories